Role of perfusion CT in the evaluation of adnexal masses

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of perfusion computed tomography (PCT) in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. Twenty patients, each of pathologically proven malignant and benign adnexal masses who had undergone PCT on 64-slice CT scanner, were included in the study. The PCT parameters, viz. blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), permeability surface index area (PS) and time to maximum of the tissue residue function (T_max) of the adnexal masses were calculated. Statistical analysis to study the association between PCT parameters and histopathological diagnosis was done. In the malignant group, the mean PS, BV and BF values were elevated. The mean T_max of the benign lesions was higher compared to that of the malignant lesions. There was a significant statistical difference in the PCT parameters between the malignant and benign groups (p value = .001). PCT can be a useful tool for differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? It is not always possible to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal lesions despite the application of various imaging techniques. Perfusion CT (PCT) is an imaging technique with which we can obtain both the morphological and functional information of tumours. Perfusion-based imaging enables us to objectively evaluate the neovascularity in a lesion. This helps in differentiating the benign lesions from aggressive malignant lesions. What do the results of this study add? The PCT parameters, viz. blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), permeability surface index area (PS) and time to maximum of the tissue residue function (Tmax) were calculated from adnexal masses on a 64-multi-slice CT scanner and correlated with their histopathological diagnoses. The values of the mean PS, BV and BF values were significantly higher in the malignant adnexal masses. The mean Tmax in the benign masses was more compared to that of the malignant lesions. Significant statistical difference was seen in PCT parameters between malignant and benign groups. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? PCT can be a useful tool for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. However, more collaborative research and robust validation are imperative to further evaluate this innovative evolving technique.