The DSM-5 appended the conceptualization of asociality in psychotic disorders as the manifestation of diminished interest in social interactions, but it also admitted that it might merely be the result of limited opportunities for social interactions. In an effort to investigate this apparent dichotomy, we used experience sampling data from 149 patients with psychotic disorder and 143 controls, and divided their social interactions into those occurring in the context of work and other structured activities that patients have limited access to, and those occurring in the context of unstructured activities such as visits and conversations that both groups can choose relatively more freely. Patients spent significantly smaller proportion of their time in structured social context, but matched the controls in the time spent in unstructured social contexts, and endorsed intact hedonic experience of both social contexts. Moreover, employment and living situation, in addition to the severity of symptoms of avolition, predicted the proportion of time patients spent in structured and unstructured social contexts, supporting the notion that both lifestyle as well as disease-specific factors contribute to real-life social behavior in psychosis.
Keywords: Asociality; EMA; ESM; Negative symptoms; Psychosis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.