Objective: Despite use of provocation testing to unmask dormant left atrium (LA)-PV conduction after index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), AF recurrence still occurs, with PV reconnection as the main cause. In an effort to answer the question whether freedom from AF recurrence can be achieved by ablation that targets sites of dormant conduction, we compared sites of dormant conduction against sites of PV reconnection identified at the time of repeat ablation for AF recurrence.
Materials and methods: The study group comprised 46 patients (30 men/16 women, aged 58.7±10.3 years) with AF (paroxysmal: n=37, persistent: n=9) who underwent repeat ablation for AF recurrence 12.3 (7.4-29.7) months after the index ablation procedure. Ipsilateral PVs were divided into 8 segments each (736 total segments), and the relation between dormant conduction sites and PV reconnection sites was determined per segment.
Results: Dormant LA-PV conduction was unmasked and ablated in 22 (47.8%) of the 46 patients at sites within 43 (5.8%) of the 736 PV segments. Late PV reconnection was found within 122 (17%) of the 736 PV segments at the time of re-ablation for AF recurrence. Only 22 (18%) of these 122 PV segments corresponded to dormant conduction sites identified during the index procedure.
Conclusion: Although additional ablation to eliminate dormant PV conduction unmasked during the index ablation procedure is performed, the majority of PVs that show reconduction at the time of treatment for clinical AF recurrence are PVs that have not shown dormant conduction.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Dormant PV conduction; Durable pulmonary vein isolation; Recurrence.
Copyright © 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.