Velocity- and power-load relationships in the half, parallel and full back squat

J Sports Sci. 2019 May;37(10):1088-1096. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1544187. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the load-velocity and load-power relationships of three common variations of the squat exercise. 52 strength-trained males performed a progressive loading test up to the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the full (F-SQ), parallel (P-SQ) and half (H-SQ) squat, conducted in random order on separate days. Bar velocity and vertical force were measured by means of a linear velocity transducer time-synchronized with a force platform. The relative load that maximized power output (Pmax) was analyzed using three outcome measures: mean concentric (MP), mean propulsive (MPP) and peak power (PP), while also including or excluding body mass in force calculations. 1RM was significantly different between exercises. Load-velocity and load-power relationships were significantly different between the F-SQ, P-SQ and H-SQ variations. Close relationships (R2 = 0.92-0.96) between load (%1RM) and bar velocity were found and they were specific for each squat variation, with faster velocities the greater the squat depth. Unlike the F-SQ and P-SQ, no sticking region was observed for the H-SQ when lifting high loads. The Pmax corresponded to a broad load range and was greatly influenced by how force output is calculated (including or excluding body mass) as well as the exact outcome variable used (MP, MPP, PP).

Keywords: Resistance training; force platform; lumbar spine; muscle strength; propulsive phase; squat depth.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Posture*
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Resistance Training
  • Weight Lifting / physiology*
  • Young Adult