POINT: Should the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Be Retired? Yes

Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):12-14. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.008.

Authors

Paul E Marik¹, Joshua D Farkas², Rory Spiegel³, Scott Weingart⁴; collaborating authors

Collaborators

collaborating authors:
Scott Aberegg, Jennifer Beck-Esmay, Steven Carroll, Jon-Emile Kenny, Alex Koyfman, Michelle Lin, Brit Long, Manu Malbrain, Justin Morgenstern, Segun Olusanya, Salim Rezaie, Philippe Rola, Manpreet Singh, Reuben Strayer, Anand Swaminathan, Adam Thomas

Affiliations

¹ Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA. Electronic address: [email protected].
² Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington VT.
³ Department Emergency Medicine, Critical Care Fellow Division of Pulmonary Critical Care University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
⁴ Department Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY.

PMID: 30616719
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.008

No abstract available

Publication types

Editorial

MeSH terms

Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
Decision Support Systems, Clinical*
Guideline Adherence*
Humans
Infection Control / methods*
Shock, Septic / prevention & control*
United States

Substances

Anti-Bacterial Agents