How to Improve Compliance With Dermatologic Screening in Liver Transplant Recipients: Experience in a (Spoke) Peripheral Center for Follow-up

Transplant Proc. 2019 Jan-Feb;51(1):184-186. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.215. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

Abstract

Annual dermatologic examination is required in all transplant recipients because of the high risk of skin cancers. Nevertheless, if the transplant recipient is merely advised to have a dermatologic consultation, the adherence usually appears to be poor. We analyzed our population of liver transplant recipients in 2 periods: in 2014 (group 1) and in 2016 (group 2), when we had organized the presence of a dermatologist at scheduled intervals to annually examine the entire liver transplant population we actively follow-up. The adherence to dermatologic screening during period 1 was significantly lower (50/179; 28% of patients) than during period 2 (198/200; 99% of patients) (P < .0001). In group 1 and 2, respectively, we found cutaneous lesions in 3 of 50 (6%) and in 13 of 198 (7%) examined patients and in 3 of 179 (1.7%) and in 13 of 200 (6.5%) of the whole groups of patients in follow-up (P = .02). The type of neoplastic lesions found at dermatologic visits were similar in group 1 (1 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 basal cell carcinoma) and group 2 (2 squamous cell carcinoma, 3 basal cell carcinoma) (P = .45), but with this intensive protocol of surveillance we discovered more preneoplastic lesions (1 leukoplakia in group 1 vs 7 actinic keratosis and 1 dysplastic nevus in group 2; P = .03). These results suggest that the planned presence of a dermatologist is mandatory among the many aspects of a well-organized transplant follow-up team.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Liver Transplantation / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance*
  • Skin Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Skin Neoplasms / etiology*
  • Transplant Recipients*