Cost-minimization analysis of GSTP1c.313A>G genotyping for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: A Bayesian inference approach

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 14;14(3):e0213929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213929. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are concerning adverse events resulting from cancer treatment, and current guidelines recommend the use of neurokinin-1-selective antagonists, such as fosaprepitant, in highly emetogenic schemes. However, the implementation of this strategy may be limited by the cost of treatment. GSTP1 c.313A>G genotype was recently described as a predictor of vomiting related to high-dose cisplatin. We hypothesized that the inclusion of routine GSTP1 c.313A>G screening may be promising in financial terms, in contrast to the wide-spread use of fosaprepitant.

Methods: A cost-minimization analysis was planned to compare GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping versus overall fosaprepitant implementation for patients with head and neck cancer under chemoradiation therapy with high-dose cisplatin. A decision analytic tree was designed, and conditional probabilities were calculated under Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations using the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The observed data included patients under treatment without fosaprepitant, while priors were derived from published studies.

Results: To introduce screening with real-time polymerase chain reaction, an initial investment of U$ 39,379.97 would be required, with an amortization cost of U$ 7,272.97 per year. The mean cost of standard therapy with fosaprepitant is U$ 243.24 per patient, and although the initial cost of routine genotyping is higher, there is a tendency of progressive minimization at a threshold of 155 patients (Credible interval-CI: 119 to 216), provided more than one sample is incorporated for simultaneous analysis. A resulting reduction of 35.83% (CI: 30.31 to 41.74%) in fosaprepitant expenditures is then expected with the implementation of GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping.

Conclusion: GSTP1 c.313A>G genotyping may reduce the use of preventive support for chemotherapy induced nausea and lower the overall cost of treatment. Despite the results of this simulation, randomized, interventional studies are required to control for known and unknown confounders as well as unexpected expenses.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Antiemetics / economics
  • Antiemetics / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Chemoradiotherapy / adverse effects
  • Cisplatin / adverse effects*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Decision Trees
  • Drug Costs
  • Glutathione S-Transferase pi / genetics*
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / therapy
  • Humans
  • Markov Chains
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Morpholines / economics
  • Morpholines / therapeutic use
  • Nausea / chemically induced*
  • Nausea / genetics
  • Nausea / prevention & control*
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists / economics
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Pharmacogenomic Testing / economics
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / economics
  • Vomiting / chemically induced*
  • Vomiting / genetics
  • Vomiting / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Antiemetics
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Morpholines
  • Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
  • fosaprepitant
  • GSTP1 protein, human
  • Glutathione S-Transferase pi
  • Cisplatin

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.