The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review

Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1294-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

Abstract

Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been used for treatment of a variety of spinal conditions including degenerative disc disorders and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Expected fusion rate of stand-alone ALIF constructs is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the fusion rate for ALIF without supplemental posterior fusion or instrumentation (stand-alone ALIF).

Methods: We queried the MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE databases for all literature related to spine fusion rates using a stand-alone ALIF procedure with a publication cutoff date of July 19, 2018. Supplementary combinations of search terms included spine, fusion, fixation, rate(s), and arthrodesis. ALIF surgery was considered stand-alone when not paired with supplemental posterior fusion or posterior spinal instrumentation. Nonhuman and non-English publications were excluded. Cohort fusion rate differences were calculated using Student t test with significance assigned if p value was less than .05.

Results: Title and abstract level review required assessing 840 unique publications. Across the 55 studies that met the inclusion criteria of this systematic review, 5,517 patients and 6,303 vertebral levels were fused. The overall weighted average patient fusion rate following stand-alone ALIF was 88.2% (range: 16.6%-100%). In the 31 studies with at least 50 subjects, the weighted average fusion rate following stand-alone ALIF was 88.6% (range: 57.5%-99.0%). Use of anterior fixation plate devices yielded a fusion rate of 94.2%. Newer zero-profile interbody implants had a fusion rate of 89.2%. Fusion rates were lower in studies with 50% or more subjects having positive smoking and worker's compensation status, however these results were found to be statistically insignificant (p>.05). Fusion rate for subjects in the eight rhBMP-2 study groups was 94.4% (n=889) compared with 84.8% (n=3,102) in 38 study groups without rhBMP-2 used.

Conclusions: Based on the available data, stand-alone ALIF procedures yield high fusion rates overall. Fusion failure and pseudoarthrosis rates are higher in study populations involving a high percentage of smokers or positive workers compensation status. Allograft utilization does not significantly improve fusion rate when compared with autograft in stand-alone ALIF constructs.

Keywords: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Cage; Fusion rate; Stand-alone; Systematic review; rhBMP-2.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone Plates / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Intervertebral Disc Degeneration / surgery*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Pseudarthrosis / epidemiology*
  • Pseudarthrosis / etiology
  • Spinal Fusion / adverse effects
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation
  • Spinal Fusion / methods*