Evaluation of roxithromycin (RU-965) versus cephradine in pneumococcal pneumonia

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;7(1):69-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01962179.

Abstract

One hundred and sixty black South African gold miners with acute pneumococcal pneumonia were enrolled in a prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing roxithromycin (150 mg 2 X day) with cephradine (1.0 g 2 X day). Ninety patients with pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae were treated for 5-10 days. Forty-three of 46 (93.4%) of the roxithromycin and all 44 (100%) of the cephradine treated groups had satisfactory clinical responses. In eight of the 46 (17%) roxithromycin treated patients and 10 of the 44 (23%) cephradine treated patients, Streptococcus pneumoniae was not eradicated from sputum cultures by the tenth day. Side effects in 18 patients (20%) were mild and were usually manifested by elevation of the transaminases; these were more common in the cephradine group (12) than in the roxithromycin group (5). Roxithromycin appears to be a safe and effective oral antibiotic for treatment of patients with mild to moderate pneumococcal pneumonia.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Black People
  • Cephalosporins / therapeutic use*
  • Cephradine / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Leucomycins / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Diseases / drug therapy
  • Pneumonia, Pneumococcal / drug therapy*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • South Africa
  • Sputum / microbiology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • Leucomycins
  • Cephradine