Clinical application of a contingent screening strategy for trisomies with cell-free DNA: a pilot study

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2434-0.

Abstract

Background: Different strategies have been designed for clinical implementation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a contingent strategy based on conventional screening and offering cfDNA to the intermediate-risk group, for the screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Secondary objectives were to assess the uptake of cfDNA in women with intermediate-risk, to evaluate the performance of cfDNA testing, and the preferences of pregnant women with intermediate risk.

Methods: Prospective observational pilot study between February 2016 and March 2017. Singleton pregnancies with a known outcome were included in the study. At the conventional screening (first trimester combined test or second trimester quadruple test) women were classified in high (risk ≥1:250) or low risk (< 1:250). For the study, a contingent strategy was applied: following the conventional screening women were classified into three groups: high risk (risk ≥1:10 or nuchal translucency ≥3 mm), intermediate-risk (risk 1:11 to 1:1500) and low risk (< 1:1500), and a cfDNA test was offered to those at the intermediate risk.

Results: For the analysis, 2639 women were included, 2422 (91.8%) had a first trimester combined test and 217 (8.2%) a second trimester quadruple test. There were 5 cases of trisomy 21, 4 of trisomy 18 and none of trisomy 13. For the contingent strategy, the detection rate and false positive rates were 88.9% (8/9) and 1.3% (35/2630), respectively. For the conventional strategy, the detection rate and false positive rates were 66.7% (6/9) and 5.3% (140/2630), respectively. The cfDNA test had a detection rate for trisomy 21 of 100% (3 out of 3), and a false positive rate of 0.2% (1/466). In a survey, 81.8% (374/457) of women in the intermediate-risk group would choose cfDNA testing as the second line test, mainly due to the lack of risk for the fetus.

Conclusion: A contingent screening strategy for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, based on conventional screening, and offering a cfDNA test to women with a risk between 1:11 to 1:1500, reduced the false positive rate and increased the detection rate for these trisomies. Moreover, this strategy is well accepted by women.

Keywords: Cell-free DNA; Contingent screening; Fetal trisomy; Prenatal screening.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
  • Down Syndrome / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Maternal Serum Screening Tests / methods
  • Noninvasive Prenatal Testing / methods*
  • Nuchal Translucency Measurement / methods
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Pilot Projects
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Trisomy 13 Syndrome / diagnosis*
  • Trisomy 18 Syndrome / diagnosis*

Substances

  • Cell-Free Nucleic Acids