Precise measurement of luminal diameter in arteries is important when planning interventional vascular procedures in patients. Measuring wall volume may be important in detecting early artery disease and in the assessment of treatments to prevent atherosclerosis. An ex vivo phantom using porcine arteries was used to evaluate the accuracy with which (i) B-mode ultrasound, (ii) 3-D tomographic ultrasound (tUS), (iii) computed tomography (CT) and (iv) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured length, diameters and volume. The mean error in inner-to-inner diameter measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were 0.08 ± 0.26, -0.73 ± 0.96 mm, 0.09 ± 0.55 and 0.60 ± 1.01 mm, respectively. The mean error in outer-to-outer diameter measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were -1.33 ± 0.61, -1.03 ± 0.35, 0.02 ± 1.00 and -0.47 ± 1.32 mm, respectively. The mean error in volume measurements by B mode, tUS, CT and MRI were -0.54 ± 0.62, -0.06 ± 0.09, 0.01 ± 0.18 and -0.20 ± 0.32 cm3, respectively. Errors in length and diameters remain within clinically acceptable thresholds where MRI was the least accurate. tUS was the most accurate method of volume measurement.
Keywords: Accuracy; Measurement of arteries; Tomographic 3-D ultrasound.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.