Insulin pen use and diabetes treatment goals: A study from Iran STEPS 2016 survey

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0221462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221462. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Background: Frequency of insulin pen use, despite its higher costs, is increasing to substitute the traditional use of insulin vials. This study aims to report insulin pen use frequency and its associated factors among participants of the STEPS survey 2016 in Iran, which was conducted based on the World Health Organization (WHO) STEPS methodology.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 19,503 (mean age of 46.03±0.13) out of 30,541 participants of the Iran STEPS survey were included (Inclusion criteria: aged >25 years old and availability of their demographic, clinical, and laboratory results for serum glucose, HbA1c, and lipid profile). Clinical and demographic characteristics, a frequency of use of each diabetes mellitus treatment type, and the association of insulin pen use with health outcomes are reported using descriptive analysis and propensity score modeling.

Results: There were 1,999(10.85%) individuals diagnosed with diabetes in the population, while 1,160(56.87%) cases were taking antihyperglycemic treatments. In this subset, 240(21.14%) individuals administered insulin with or without using oral agents at the same time. 52.28% of participants who were under insulin therapy used insulin pens. None of the socioeconomic determinants, including gender (p-value = 0.11), type of residential areas (p-value = 0.52), years of schooling (p-value = 0.27), wealth index (p-value = 0.19), marital status (p-value = 0.37), and insurance types (p-value = 0.72) were significantly different among groups using insulin pens and insulin vials. Moreover, in the propensity score modeling, pen usage was not associated with a lower heart attack and ischemic stroke histories, systolic blood pressure, serum lipid profile, blood glucose, or HbA1c levels.

Conclusion: Results showed that the use of the higher-costing insulin pens compared to traditional vials and syringes is not associated with improved glycemic control and better lipid profile in our sample. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and to compare other aspects of insulin pen use, including adherence to treatment and cost-effectiveness.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Comorbidity
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / drug therapy*
  • Female
  • Goals*
  • Humans
  • Insulin / administration & dosage
  • Insulin / therapeutic use*
  • Insulin Infusion Systems*
  • Iran
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Insulin

Grants and funding

This study was funded by Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Islamic Republic of Iran (Grant Number: 241/M/93259). There are no external founding resources affecting the data collection, analysis, interpretation. The authors have not been paid by any pharmaceutical companies or other related agencies and the corresponding author of the manuscript had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.