Prospective Comparison of 70-kVp Single-Energy CT versus Dual-Energy CT: Which is More Suitable for CT Angiography with Low Contrast Media Dosage?

Rationale and objectives: To compare the objective and subjective image qualities between single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 70 kVp and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-source dual-energy CT for CT angiography with 180 mgI/kg.

Materials and methods: Total 63 patients scanned with 180 mgI/kg were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (32 patients) underwent CT angiography at 70-kVp, and Group B (31 patients) underwent dual-energy CT. VMI sets were generated at 10-keV increments between 40 and 100 keV. We calculated aortic attenuation, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio, figure of merit of CNR, and effective dose for each protocol. Three radiologists scored overall image quality and various arteries' visibility using a four-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons between 70 kVp and VMI with the highest CNR were performed with the two-tailed t test or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: The 40-keV images offered the highest CNR among VMIs. Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp was significantly lower than that at 40 keV (p < 0.001). However, the signal-to-noise-ratio, CNR, and figure of merit of CNR were significantly higher at 70 kVp than those at 40-keV (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). The effective dose of each group was almost equal. The qualitative visibility scores for various arteries, except the ascending and upper-abdominal aorta, were also better at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV.

Conclusion: Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp with 180 mg I/kg was lower than that of VMI at 40 keV, and the objective and subjective image qualities were higher at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV.