OBJECTIVE. This review describes the influence of histology and metastatic sites on prognosis in male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs) and explains the role imaging in assessing therapeutic response, residual disease, recurrence, sand treatment-related toxicities. CONCLUSION. Seminomatous and nonseminomatous GCTs differ in imaging appearance, pattern of spread, and prognosis, and an organ-based approach is helpful in prognostication. Multimodality imaging aids in accurate staging, prognostication, characterization of treatment response, and identification of therapy-related toxicity.
Keywords: cancer; germ cell tumor; imaging; seminoma; seminomatous; testicular; toxicity.