The option of having a support person available in industrial disputes and disciplinary hearings has become a well-accepted practice. However, the implications of having a third party present and the potential for inhibition of disclosure in the forensic psychiatric/psychological assessment has not been examined in more than a limited fashion. Expectations of claimants and lawyers that the presence of a support person is a right and assumptions that altering the usual one-to-one dynamic has no influence are challenged in this experience-based commentary. Instances in which the support person may be a "help" or a "hindrance" are outlined, as are recommendations for managing some of the common pitfalls in conducting the evaluation in the presence of another party. An argument is also made for heightened awareness on the part of solicitors about choosing an appropriate support person.
Keywords: legal advice; psychiatric medico-legal assessment; support person.
© 2017 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.