Comparison of oligosaccharide labeling employing reductive amination and hydrazone formation chemistries

Electrophoresis. 2020 May;41(9):684-690. doi: 10.1002/elps.201900475. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

Abstract

In this work, we compare labeling by two negatively charged fluorescent labels, 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) and 8-(2-hydrazino-2-oxoethoxy)pyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (Cascade Blue hydrazide [CBH]). Effectiveness of the labeling chemistries were investigated by 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and maltoheptaose followed by LC/UV-MS and CE/LIF analysis, respectively. The reaction yield of APTS labeling was determined to be only ∼10%. This is due to reduction of almost 90% of the analyte by sodium cyanoborohydride to alcohol, which cannot be further labeled via reductive amination. However, the CBH labeling provides ∼90% reaction yield based on the LC/UV-MS measurements. The significantly higher labeling yield was also confirmed by CE/LIF measurements. Finally, the more effective hydrazone formation technique of CBH was characterized and applied for N-linked glycan analysis by CE/LIF.

Keywords: Hydrazone formation; Labeling; Oligosaccharides; Reductive amination.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amination
  • Chromatography, Liquid / methods
  • Electrophoresis, Capillary / methods
  • Fluorescent Dyes / chemistry
  • Hydrazones / chemistry*
  • Mass Spectrometry / methods
  • Oligosaccharides / analysis*
  • Oligosaccharides / chemistry
  • Pyrenes / chemistry

Substances

  • 1-aminopyrene-3,6,8-trisulfonic acid
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Hydrazones
  • Oligosaccharides
  • Pyrenes