Academic Centers Compared With Nonacademic Centers for Patients With International Prognostic Index Risk-stratified Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Survival Outcomes Analysis

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020 Apr;20(4):e174-e183. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Abstract

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease associated with varying outcomes. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been the standard for the baseline prognostic assessment in these patients. The present study aimed to determine the effect of the treatment facility on the overall survival outcomes in patients with DLBCL stratified by IPI risk groups.

Materials and methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with a diagnosis of DLBCL from 2004 to 2015. DLBCL was stratified by the IPI risk score from low- to high-risk disease, and the overall survival of those treated at academic centers was compared with that of those treated at nonacademic centers.

Results: Treatment at academic centers was associated with significantly improved overall survival for all patients with DLBCL (108.3 months) compared with those treated at nonacademic centers (74.5 months; P < .001). The median survival for patients with high-risk disease treated at academic centers (33.5 months) was more than twice that of high-risk patients treated at nonacademic centers (14.4 months; P < .001). The median survival for the other risk categories was similarly improved, although less pronounced in the lower IPI score groups. The long-term overall survival for all patients with DLBCL at academic centers was improved at 5 and 10 years (59% and 43% survival, respectively) compared with those treated at nonacademic centers (51% and 35% survival, respectively; P < .001).

Conclusion: Patients with DLBCL treated at academic centers demonstrated improved survival compared with those treated at nonacademic centers, especially those with high-risk disease. Further investigations into the factors contributing to such disparities are required to help standardize care and improve outcomes.

Keywords: DLBCL; Database; High risk; IPI; NCDB.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Academic Medical Centers*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage*
  • Databases, Factual*
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse* / drug therapy
  • Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse* / mortality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Survival Rate
  • United States / epidemiology