Based on the results of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 56 couples, the power was assessed of traditional sperm characteristics of native semen to discriminate between in vitro fertile and in vitro infertile semen. The number per ejaculate of spermatozoa with regular oval heads was the best discriminant, followed by the concentration of progressively motile spermatozoa. This contrasts with the in vivo fertilizing capacity, which depends mostly on the proportion and concentration of spermatozoa with rapid linear progression. The lower limit of sperm characteristics was assessed as the fifth percentile of in vitro fertile semen and was compared with the lower limit of semen of fertile men and of subfertile men who achieved spontaneous or treatment-related conception in vivo. It appeared that the semen quality needed for in vitro fertilization is inferior to that of fertile men but not remarkably different from that of subfertile men who achieved spontaneous conception during 1-year follow-up after consultation. If conventional methods for semen preparation are used, there seems to be no major advantage in favor of IVF for the treatment of male infertility due to sperm deficiency. An increased success rate may, however, be attained, thanks to improved techniques of semen collection, semen preparation, and oocyte insemination.