The clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenomic testing for patients with depression: a meta-analysis

Pharmacogenomics. 2020 Jun;21(8):559-569. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0157. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

Abstract

Aim: To perform a meta-analysis of prospective, two-arm studies examining the clinical utility of using the combinatorial pharmacogenomic test, GeneSight Psychotropic, to inform treatment decisions for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients & methods: The pooled mean effect of symptom improvement and pooled relative risk ratio (RR) of response and remission were calculated using a random effect model. Results: Overall, 1556 patients were included from four studies, with outcomes evaluated at week 8 or week 10. Patient outcomes were significantly improved for patients with MDD whose care was guided by the combinatorial pharmacogenomic test results compared with unguided care (symptom improvement Δ = 10.08%, 95% CI: 1.67-18.50; p = 0.019; response RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.17-1.67; p < 0.001; remission RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.17-1.89; p = 0.001). Conclusion: GeneSight Psychotropic guided care improves outcomes among patients with MDD.

Keywords: GeneSight; clinical utility; combinatorial pharmacogenomics; depression; major depressive disorder; meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Antidepressive Agents / adverse effects
  • Antidepressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / drug therapy*
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / epidemiology
  • Depressive Disorder, Major / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Pharmacogenomic Testing / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Psychotropic Drugs / adverse effects
  • Psychotropic Drugs / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Antidepressive Agents
  • Psychotropic Drugs