State strategies to address medicaid prescription spending: negotiated pricing vs price transparency

Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Apr;16(2):201-215. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000080. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Abstract

This research longitudinally examines the association between levels of state Medicaid prescription spending and the state strategies intended to constrain cost increases: the negotiated pricing strategy, as indicated by state rebate programs, and the price transparency strategy, as indicated by state operation of All-Payer Claims Databases. The findings demonstrate evidence that state Medicaid prescription spending is influenced by the negotiated pricing strategy, especially Managed Care Organization (MCO) rebates under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, but not influenced by the price transparency strategy. State decisions for MCO rebates, such as carving prescription benefits into managed care benefits, were effective in containing levels of Medicaid prescription spending over time, while other single- and multi-state rebate programs were not. Based on these findings, state policymakers may consider utilizing the MCO rebate program to address increases in Medicaid prescription spending.

Keywords: Affordable Care Act; All payer claims databases; Medicaid prescription spending; Negotiated pricing; Price transparency.

MeSH terms

  • Cost Control / methods*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis*
  • Drug Costs
  • Managed Care Programs / economics*
  • Medicaid / economics*
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Prescription Drugs / economics*
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms
  • State Government
  • United States

Substances

  • Prescription Drugs