Introduction: To assess the potential added value of rapid MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of bacteria in positive blood cultures to the information provided by Gram staining for adequate empirical antibiotic treatment adjustments in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. In the pre-MALDI-TOF MS phase of the study antibiotic adjustments were made on the basis of Gram stain results, whereas in the MALDI-TOF MS phase they were based on information provided by Gram staining and MALDI-TOF MS results. No antimicrobial stewardship program for BSI was in place within the study period. Antibiotic regimens were categorized as correct, improvable or incorrect.
Results: Cohorts were matched for demographics, clinical characteristics of patients and bacterial species involved. Enterobacteriales were the most represented in both study periods (67%), followed by Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci. The number of patients receiving correct, improvable and incorrect empirical antibiotic treatments was comparable for both study periods (P = 0.45, P = 0.57, P = 0.87, respectively). The percentage of patients who ended up receiving correct treatment following modified empirical antibiotic regimens was significantly higher (P = 0.008) in the MALDI-TOF MS phase (27 patients/38.6%) than in the pre-MALDI-TOF MS phase of the study (11 patients/15.7%), although overall adequate coverage of the bacteria causing the infection was comparable across the study periods (90%).
Conclusion: Gram stain results offer valuable information for early adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapies for BSI. Nevertheless, rapid identification of bacteria involved in BSI by MALDI-TOF MS provides added value to achieve this aim.
Keywords: Antibiotic treatment; Bacteremia; Blood culture; Gram staining; Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
Copyright © 2020 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.