Noninvasive prenatal testing as compared to chorionic villus sampling is more sensitive for the detection of confined placental mosaicism involving the cytotrophoblast

Prenat Diagn. 2020 Sep;40(10):1338-1342. doi: 10.1002/pd.5766. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

Authors

Diane Van Opstal¹, Geerke M Eggenhuizen², Marieke Joosten¹, Karin Diderich¹, Lutgarde Govaerts¹, Robert-Jan Galjaard¹, Attie Go², Maarten Knapen², Marjan Boter¹, Wai Y Cheung¹, Nicole van Koetsveld¹, Stefanie van Veen¹, Walter G de Valk¹, Fernanda Jehee¹, Femke de Vries¹, Iris Hollink¹, Lies Hoefsloot¹, Malgorzata Srebniak¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
² Department of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PMID: 32533714
PMCID: PMC7540368
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5766

No abstract available

Publication types

Case Reports
Comparative Study
Letter

MeSH terms

Adult
Chorionic Villi Sampling* / methods
Female
Genetic Testing / methods
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Mosaicism*
Netherlands
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing* / methods
Placenta Diseases / diagnosis*
Placenta Diseases / genetics
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Trophoblasts / metabolism
Trophoblasts / pathology