Inclusion of initial caries lesions in a population-based sample of Brazilian preschool children: Impact on estimates and treatment needs

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234122. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess changes in epidemiological estimates and treatment needed when initial caries lesions are included in a population-based survey of preschool children. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a Brazilian municipality, collecting data of preschool children in 16 health centers. Caries detection used the merged codes (epi-codes) for ICDAS/ICCMS. An option for treatment, according to ICCMS, was chosen during the examination. Caries experience (dmft/dmfs) and prevalence were estimated considering three thresholds (A- initial, moderate, and severe lesions, B- only moderate and severe lesions and C- severe lesions). Incremental need for non-operative care was also verified. The sample consisted of 663 children aged 2-4 years (response rate of 99.85%). Including initial lesions, a 2-fold increase in dmft was observed (A: 3.36, B: 1.02, p<0.001). With the inclusion, the caries prevalence increased to 75% compared to threshold B only (28%). The majority (76%) of children who required any intervention (56%) should be scheduled for non-operative care. We suggest that including initial caries lesions in an epidemiological survey may significantly impact assessment of population caries experience.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dental Caries / epidemiology
  • Dental Caries / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Severity of Illness Index

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (400736/2014-4), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (309817/2015-3, 304319/2018-0). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.