Clinical efficacy of ceramic versus resin-based composite endocrowns in Chinese adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials. 2020 Jun 22;21(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04506-9.

Abstract

Background: Endocrown restoration is widely used to restore endodontically treated teeth. However, the clinical effects of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials for endocrown restoration are not clear. The primary objective of this trial is to compare the clinical efficacy of resin-based bloc and ceramic endocrowns for restoring endodontically treated teeth.

Methods: The proposed resin-based bloc and ceramic endocrown assessment trial is a parallel group-designed randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 156 adults between 18 and 75 years old with a minimum of one such molar. The inclusion criteria were good oral hygiene habits, root apex of molar without evident damage, receipt of standard endodontic treatment, need for endocrown restoration, and only one endocrown restoration performed per patient. Patients participating in another study or those with systemic diseases, disabilities, or known allergies to used materials will be excluded. All patients will be randomized and restored with resin-based bloc and ceramic endocrown according to a random number table. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline and after treatment at 6, 12, and 24 months, in accordance with the modified Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria, by two independent evaluators. The primary outcome is marginal adaptation; secondary outcomes include wear, tooth integrity, fracture of material and retention, marginal staining, and patient view. All data will be analyzed by an independent statistician. Signed rank-sum tests will be used for intragroup comparisons. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests will be used for intergroup comparisons. Hierarchical logistic regression will be used to adjust the baseline and other important indicators.

Discussion: This study will investigate endocrowns of two CAD/CAM materials for endodontically treated molars. The results may help clinicians choose the better CAD/CAM material option and explain to patients the advantages and disadvantages of these two materials with evidence-based support. For patients, the results may lead to improvement in long-term restoration.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04033380. Registered on 24 July 2019.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; Ceramic; Endocrown; Endodontically treated teeth; Randomized controlled trial; Resin composite.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial Protocol

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Physiological
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Ceramics*
  • China
  • Composite Resins*
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Crowns*
  • Dental Restoration Repair / methods*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Materials Testing / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Molar
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Composite Resins

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04033380