Choosing Daily Labs Wisely in the Hospital: A Novel Tool for Assessing Laboratory Testing Appropriateness

Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Jul/Sep;29(3):169-172. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000258.

Abstract

Background: The Minnesota Lab Appropriateness (MLAB) criteria were developed for assessing appropriateness of complete blood counts (CBCs) and serum electrolyte panels (SEPs) ordered for adult inpatients.

Methods: Two independent raters used the MLAB criteria to rate appropriateness of labs ordered during 50 hospitalizations through retrospective medical record review.

Results: Evaluation of 208 CBCs and 253 SEPs on a 2-category scale (appropriate/inappropriate) resulted in an inappropriate lab rate of 24% and 25% for CBCs and SEPs, respectively. Using a 3-category Likert scale that included an "equivocal" rating to allow for clinical uncertainty, 17% of CBCs and 20% of SEPs were considered inappropriate. Interrater reliability was "substantial" using the dichotomous scale for both CBCs and SEPs. Using the 3-category Likert scale, reliability was "substantial" for CBCs and "moderate" for SEPs.

Conclusion: The MLAB criteria identified inappropriate labs at a rate consistent with published figures, with good interrater reliability.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Blood Cell Count / standards*
  • Clinical Decision-Making*
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards*
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / statistics & numerical data*
  • Electrolytes / blood*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • United States
  • Unnecessary Procedures / standards*
  • Unnecessary Procedures / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Electrolytes