Comorbidity Assessment Is Uneven Across Veterans Health Administration and Medicare for the Same Patient: Implications for Risk Adjustment

Med Care. 2020 Aug;58(8):717-721. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001329.

Abstract

Objective: Compare comorbidity identification in Medicare and Veterans Health Administration (VA) data for the purposes of risk adjustment.

Data sources: Analysis of Medicare and VA datasets for dually-enrolled Veterans receiving care in both settings, fiscal years 2010-2014.

Study design: A retrospective analysis of administrative data for a national sample of cancer decedents.

Data extraction methods: Comorbidities were evaluated using Elixhauser and Charlson coding algorithms.

Principal findings: Clinical comorbidities were more likely to be recorded in Medicare than in VA datasets. Of 42 comorbidities, 36 (86%) were recorded at a different frequency. For example, congestive heart failure was recorded for 22.0% of patients in Medicare data and for 11.3% of patients in VA data (P<0.001).

Conclusion: There are large differences in comorbidity assessment across VA and Medicare administrative data for the same patient, posing challenges for risk adjustment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Comorbidity*
  • Eligibility Determination / methods
  • Eligibility Determination / standards*
  • Eligibility Determination / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medicare / statistics & numerical data*
  • Middle Aged
  • Privatization / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Adjustment / methods*
  • Risk Adjustment / statistics & numerical data
  • United States
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs / statistics & numerical data*