A systematic review and meta-analysis of valued obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) procedures in resource-poor areas

Surg Open Sci. 2020 Apr 12;2(3):127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2020.03.002. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Obstetric and gynecologic procedures are valuable in rural settings. Data identifying common procedures may better prepare surgeons to meet patient needs in remote settings.

Materials and methods: A literature review using key MeSH terms was performed according to methods described by the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA on studies that described obstetric and gynecologic surgery in rural high-income countries or any setting in middle- to low-income countries. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects modeling for odds ratios of cesarean delivery and hysterectomy as proportions of total surgical volume.

Results: A total of 195 studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 22 for quantitative analysis. Obstetric and gynecologic procedures made up a 19% of all surgical cases. As compared to other obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures, cesarean delivery was the most common procedure with odds ratio of 2.39 (95% confidence interval 1.48-3.86), and hysterectomy was the second most common procedure with odds ratio of 1.60 (1.57-1.64). However, heterogeneity between the studies was extremely high and risk of bias was high, limiting quality of findings.

Conclusion: Greater provision of surgical care can be enhanced by defining which procedures are most needed, which include many obstetric and gynecologic procedures, most commonly cesarean delivery and hysterectomy.

Publication types

  • Review