Introduction: The Paris System for Urine Cytology (TPS) provides well-defined diagnostic criteria for the category of atypical urothelial cells (AUC). The current study compares the rate of AUC diagnoses at a large academic medical center before and after an educational intervention (EI) by a urine cytology expert.
Materials and methods: An expert in TPS delivered an educational intervention consisting of an interactive microscope session and a didactic session that focused on the AUC diagnostic category. The number of urine cytology cases, the AUC rate, and the false-negative percentage were calculated before and after the EI, using the electronic medical records and cytologic-histologic correlation records.
Results: A total of 4026 urine cytology cases were signed out in the 25 months prior to the educational intervention and 1585 cases were signed out in the 10 months after the intervention. EI had a significant impact on diagnostic categorization, including a reduction in AUC (19.6% versus 12.5%) and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (3.9% versus 3.1%) diagnoses. The cytotechnologists also placed fewer cases into the AUC category during primary screening (27.6% versus 23.0%). Although a higher percentage of cases was reported as negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma, the false-negative rate did not significantly change after the intervention (1.8% versus 2.0% of negative cases, P = 0.65).
Conclusions: Focused educational sessions for pathologists and cytotechnologists on the diagnostic criteria for AUC as defined by TPS can significantly reduce the rate of atypical diagnoses without a significant increase in the rate of false negatives.
Keywords: Atypia; Cytology; Cytopathology; Education; The Paris System; Urine; Urothelial carcinoma.
Copyright © 2020 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.