Safety and Efficacy of Double Antithrombotic Therapy With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Aug 18;9(16):e017212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017212. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Abstract

Background The optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is a topic of debate. We aimed at defining the efficacy and safety of double antithrombotic therapy with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) against triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) added to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), illustrating the pooled cumulative distribution of events, the ranking of different NOACs tested in NOAC+SAPT combination strategies, and the state of the current evidence in the field. Methods and Results Randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of trial-defined major adverse cardiac events. The primary safety end point was clinically significant bleeding. Secondary end points were the components of primary end points. Trial-level pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses, reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analyses, and trial sequential analysis were performed. Four randomized controlled trials (10 969 patients) were included. No differences were found in terms of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.22), and the NOAC+SAPT strategy showed a lower rate of clinically significant bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.80). These results were consistent in reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the Bayesian network meta-analysis, different NOACs displayed diverse risk-benefit profiles. Trial sequential analyses suggest that the evidence for the similarity in major adverse cardiac events compared with VKA + DAPT and the bleeding risk reduction observed with NOAC+SAPT is likely to be conclusive. Conclusions NOAC+SAPT does not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events and reduces the risk of bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT in AF patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Various NOACs may have different risk-benefit profiles in combination strategies. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42020151089.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; anticoagulant therapy; antiplatelet therapy; antithrombotic therapy; atrial fibrillation; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Antithrombins / adverse effects
  • Antithrombins / therapeutic use*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / complications*
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / mortality
  • Cause of Death
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / methods
  • Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Hemorrhage / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*
  • Publication Bias
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists / adverse effects
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Thrombosis / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Antithrombins
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists