Impact of Medicare's Bundled Payments Initiative on Patient Selection, Payments, and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006171. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Abstract

Background: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation launched the Bundled Payments for Care Initiative (BPCI) in 2013. Its effect on payments and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unknown.

Methods and results: We used Medicare inpatient files to identify index admissions for PCI and CABG from 2013 through 2016 at BPCI hospitals and matched control hospitals and difference in differences models to compare the 2 groups. Our primary outcome was the change in standardized Medicare-allowed payments per 90-day episode. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient selection, discharge to postacute care, length of stay, emergency department use, readmissions, and mortality. Forty-two hospitals joined BPCI for PCI and 46 for CABG. There were no differential changes in patient selection between BPCI and control hospitals. Baseline Medicare payments per episode for PCI were $20 164 at BPCI hospitals and $19 955 at control hospitals. For PCI, payments increased at both BPCI and control hospitals during the intervention period, such that there was no significant difference in differences (BPCI hospitals +$673, P=0.048; control hospitals +$551, P=0.022; difference in differences $122, P=0.768). For CABG, payments at both BPCI and control hospitals decreased during the intervention period (BPCI baseline, $36 925, change -$2918, P<0.001; control baseline, $36 877, change -$2618, P<0.001; difference in differences, $300; P=0.730). For both PCI and CABG, BPCI participation was not associated with changes in mortality, readmissions, or length of stay. Among BPCI hospitals, emergency department use differentially increased for patients undergoing PCI and decreased for patients undergoing CABG.

Conclusions: Participation in episode-based payment for PCI and CABG was not associated with changes in patient selection, payments, length of stay, or clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Medicare; coronary artery bypass; length of stay; percutaneous coronary intervention; readmission.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / adverse effects
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / economics*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Disease / diagnosis
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics*
  • Coronary Artery Disease / mortality
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Health, Reimbursement / economics*
  • Length of Stay / economics
  • Male
  • Medicare / economics*
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / economics*
  • Patient Care Bundles / economics*
  • Patient Readmission / economics
  • Patient Selection*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / economics*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / mortality
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States