A cost-analysis of conducting population-based prevalence surveys for the validation of the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem in Amhara, Ethiopia

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 3;14(9):e0008401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008401. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Trachoma prevalence surveys, including impact surveys (TIS) and surveillance surveys (TSS), provide information to program managers on the impact of the SAFE (surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental improvement) strategy and current burden of disease, and they provide a crucial component of the evidence base necessary for the validation of the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. The prevalence surveys included in this analysis are multi-level cluster random surveys that provide population-based estimates for program planning. This study conducted an analysis of the cost of 8 rounds of TIS/TSS executed in Amhara, Ethiopia, 2012-2016, comprising 232,357 people examined over 1,828 clusters in 187 districts.

Methodology and findings: Cost data were collected retrospectively from accounting and procurement records from the implementing partner, The Carter Center, and coded by survey activity (i.e. training and field work) and input category (i.e. personnel, transportation, supplies, venue rental, and other). Estimates of staff time were obtained from The Carter Center Ethiopia. Data were analyzed by activity and input category. The mean total cost per cluster surveyed was $752 (standard deviation $101). Primary cost drivers were personnel (39.6%) and transportation (49.2%), with costs increasing in the last 3 rounds of TIS/TSS.

Conclusion: Despite the considerable cost of conducting TIS and TSS, these surveys provide necessary information for program managers. Limited options are available to reduce the costs of TIS/TSS and gain economies of scale, as the surveys must be designed to achieve their designated sample size. However, surveys must also be designed in a way that is possible to be executed given the financial resources, personnel, and time required. Program managers can use these findings to improve estimates of the total cost of a survey and its components to ensure that sufficient resources are budgeted accordingly.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Ethiopia / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Neglected Diseases / economics
  • Neglected Diseases / epidemiology
  • Neglected Diseases / prevention & control
  • Prevalence
  • Public Health / economics*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Trachoma / economics*
  • Trachoma / epidemiology
  • Trachoma / prevention & control

Grants and funding

This is a routine monitoring activity as part of a national trachoma program technically and financially assisted by The Carter Center in collaboration with the Amhara Regional Health Bureau, Ethiopia, and carried out by program personnel. This work was made possible thanks to many donors, including the Lions Clubs International Foundation; the United Kingdom Department for International Development; in 2013 the generous support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (https://www.usaid.gov/) and the ENVISION project led by RTI International under cooperative agreement No. AID-OAA-A-11-00048; and the William H. Donner Foundation. The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any funder, including the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. The study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript were made by the program personnel in collaboration with the Amhara Regional Health Bureau, Ethiopia.