Objectives: To investigate the intra- and inter-scanner repeatability and reproducibility of CT radiomics features (RF) of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (fILD).
Methods: For this prospective, IRB-approved test-retest study, CT data of sixty fILD patients were acquired. Group A (n = 30) underwent one repeated CT scan on a single scanner. Group B (n = 30) was scanned using two different CT scanners. All CT data were reconstructed using different reconstruction kernels (soft, intermediate, sharp) and slice thicknesses (one and three millimeters), resulting in twelve datasets per patient. Following ROI placement in fibrotic lung tissue, 86 RF were extracted. Intra- and inter-scanner RF repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for corresponding kernels and slice thicknesses, and between lung-specific and non-lung-specific reconstruction parameters. Furthermore, test-retest lung volumes were compared.
Results: Test-retest demonstrated a majority of RF is highly repeatable for all reconstruction parameter combinations. Intra-scanner reproducibility was negatively affected by reconstruction kernel changes, and further reduced by slice thickness alterations. Inter-scanner reproducibility was highly variable, reconstruction parameter-specific, and greatest if either soft kernels and three-millimeter slice thickness, or lung-specific reconstruction parameters were used for both scans. Test-retest lung volumes showed no significant difference.
Conclusion: CT RF of fILD are highly repeatable for constant reconstruction parameters in a single scanner. Intra- and inter-scanner reproducibility are severely impacted by alterations in slice thickness more than reconstruction kernel, and are reconstruction parameter-specific. These findings may facilitate CT data and RF selection and assessment in future fILD radiomics studies collecting data across scanners.
Keywords: Adult; Computed tomography; Interstitial lung disease; Lung fibrosis; Radiomics; Reproducibility of results.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.