Healthcare utilization and total costs of care among patients with advanced metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer

Future Oncol. 2021 Jan;17(3):291-299. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-0516. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

Aim: Study first-line (1L) treatment patterns and economic outcomes among patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and esophageal cancer (EC). Materials & methods: Newly diagnosed patients with systemic GC and EC treatments were identified between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2017; costs were presented as per patient per month (PPPM) basis. Results: Study included 392 GC and 436 EC patients. Most frequently used 1L regimens were: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + oxaliplatin (22.5%) and epirubicin + cisplatin + 5-FU (ECF)/ECF modifications (21.9%) in patients with GC; and carboplatin + paclitaxel (29.6%) and 5-FU + oxaliplatin (11.5%) in EC patients. Mean all-cause costs were US$16,242 PPPM for GC, and $18,384 PPPM for EC during 1L treatment. Conclusion: GC and EC were resource intensive and costly. High costs and short treatment durations underscored a gap in care in 1L treatment.

Keywords: esophageal cancer; first-line systemic treatment; gastric cancer; second-line systemic treatment; treatment pattern.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / economics*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care / statistics & numerical data*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Stomach Neoplasms / economics*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology
  • United States / epidemiology
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding