A comparison of cyclosporine A and Nva2-cyclosporine (cyclosporine G) in a rat renal allograft model

Transplantation. 1987 Jul;44(1):9-12. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198707000-00003.

Abstract

We compared CsG and CsA in the DA-to-Lewis rat renal allograft model. At equivalent oral doses, plasma radioimmunoassay (RIA) CsG levels were higher than CsA (P less than 0.02). Neither drug prevented rejection at doses of 5 mg/kg/day. CsG-treated rats had a higher rejection rate at doses of 7.5 mg/kg/day (P less than 0.05). Both drugs were equally effective in preventing rejection at doses of 10 mg/kg/day. Neither drug was nephrotoxic at the doses used in this study. CsG is a potent immunosuppressant, and thus a potential clinical successor to CsA. Since CsG and CsA provide equivalent immunosuppression at therapeutic doses, CsG's clinical significance will ultimately depend on its nephrotoxicity in man.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cyclosporine*
  • Cyclosporins / blood
  • Cyclosporins / therapeutic use*
  • Cyclosporins / toxicity
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
  • Graft Rejection / drug effects*
  • Kidney Diseases / chemically induced
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Rats
  • Rats, Inbred Lew / immunology
  • Transplantation, Homologous

Substances

  • Cyclosporins
  • cyclosporin G
  • Cyclosporine