Sex Disparity in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: Do Our Current Echocardiographic Reference Ranges Measure Up?

Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 8.

Abstract

Reducing inequity in access to health care and disparity in health outcomes remain key objectives in cardiovascular medicine. Echocardiography is often the primary diagnostic tool used to detect cardiovascular disease (CVD), and relies on comparison with published reference ranges to appropriately detect pathology. Our understanding of the contribution of age, sex and ethnicity to quantification of cardiac size is improving, but cardiovascular disease management guidelines have yet to evolve. While recently, sex, age and ethnicity-specific reference values have been produced, treatment thresholds in many clinical guidelines do not differentiate between sexes. As a result, in order to reach management thresholds, women are often required to have more severe pathology. In order to reduce potential disadvantage to women, future research efforts should be directed to develop more personalised treatment approaches by identification of sex-appropriate management thresholds.

Keywords: Echocardiography; Reference ranges; Sex.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Diseases / diagnosis
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Echocardiography / methods*
  • Female
  • Global Health
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Morbidity / trends
  • Sex Factors