Immortal time bias in the association between toxicity and response for immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Immunotherapy. 2021 Feb;13(3):257-270. doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0179. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

Abstract

Only a minority of studies addressing the association between immune-related adverse events (IrAE) and outcome considered the immortal time bias, with conflicting results. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched through 2 January 2020. Studies reporting the impact of IrAE on outcome in patients treated with antiprogrammed death receptor 1 or PD-L1 were included. Twenty nine articles were included. IrAEs were associated with improved outcomes with high heterogeneity. With a landmark approach, the association between IrAE and outcome remains significant but the effect size was smaller (hazard ratio 0.61 vs 0.41 for overall survival; p = 0.015; hazard ratio 0.66 vs 0.47 for progression-free survival, p = 0.029; odds ratio 2.59 vs 6.77 for overall response rate; p < 0.001), no significant heterogeneity. Our analysis suggests a confounding effect of immortal time bias and a real effect of IrAE on outcome.

Keywords: IrAE; advanced cancer; bias; immortal time; immune checkpoint; immunotherapy; landmark; response; survival; toxicity.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions / mortality
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / adverse effects*
  • Immunotherapy / adverse effects
  • Immunotherapy / mortality
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Neoplasms / pathology
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors