Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring in humans, and new treatment strategies are critically needed. The lack of reliable preclinical animal models of AF is a major limitation to drug development of novel antiarrhythmic compounds.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive head-to-head assessment of 5 canine AF models.
Methods: Five canine models were evaluated for the efficacy of AF induction and AF duration. We tested 2 acute models: short-term atrial tachypacing (AT) for 6 hours with analysis of AF at hourly increments, and carbachol injection into a cardiac fat pad followed by short-term AT. We also tested 3 chronic models: pacemaker implantation followed by either 4 weeks of AT and subsequent atrial burst pacing or intermittent long-term AT for up to 4-5 months to generate AF ≥4.5 hours, and finally ventricular tachypacing to induce heart failure followed by atrial burst pacing to induce AF.
Results: Careful evaluation showed that acute AT, AT for 4 weeks, and the heart failure model all were unsuccessful in generating reproducible AF episodes of sufficient duration to study antiarrhythmic drugs. In contrast, intermittent long-term AT generated AF lasting ≥4.5 hours in ∼30% of animals. The acute model using carbachol and short-term AT resulted in AF induction of ≥15 minutes in ≥75% of animals, thus enabling testing of antiarrhythmic drugs.
Conclusion: Intermittent long-term AT and the combination of local carbachol injection with successive short-term AT may contribute to future drug development efforts for AF treatment.
Keywords: Arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Canine; Drug discovery; Tachypacing.
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.