Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity

Background: Cultivating the professional knowledge and professional identity of nursing students is important for nursing education. The degree of professional identity of nursing students will directly affect their career options and work performance after graduation. Clinical practice is a learning process of combining the knowledge and the practical techniques of nursing. It is the important way to cultivate the students' comprehensive ability, professional attitude and professional emotion. Effective clinical supervision during the clinical practice plays an important role in guaranteeing clinial practice quality and cultivating professional nursing students. Active teaching supervision is helpful to achieve the expected learning effect. Therefore, it is vital to evaluate the clinical supervision ability of the clinical nursing teachers. However, there is no special assessment instrument available in China.

Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool (mCAST).

Design: A cross sectional survey design with a convenience sample was used in this study. This cross-sectional psychometric instrumental study determined the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the modified Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool (mCAST).

Settings: Twelve hospitals in Tianjin, China.

Participants: A total of 350 registered nurses who perform teaching tasks in clinical practice were recruited.

Methods: The Chinese version of the mCSAT was translated and tested by obtaining the authorization of the developer of the mCAST using Brislin's model (that is, translation, back translation, cultural adaptation and pilot study). A total of 350 registered nurses who perform teaching tasks in clinical practice were recruited by convenience sampling for the assessment of construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Moreover, item analysis, internal correlation coefficients, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, test-retest realibility and split-half reliability were conducted to test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the mCSAT.

Results: The Chinese version of the mCSAT contained 2 subscales, namely, mCSAT-Knowledge and mCSAT-Skills. Exploratory factor analysis of the knowledge and skills subscales explained 63.26% and 63.60% of the total variances, respectively. The mCSAT-Knowledge subscale contains 3 dimensions, namely, evaluating learning (10 items), facilitating learning (9 items) and problem solving (10 items); the mCSAT-Skills subscale contains 3 dimensions, namely, evaluating learning (10 items), facilitating learning (9 items) and problem solving (10 items). The Cronbach's α coefficients of the mCSAT-Knowledge and mCSAT-Skills subscales were both 0.95. The split-half reliability of the mCSAT-Knowledge and mCSAT-Skills subscales were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively.

Conclusion: The Chinese version of the mCSAT was reliable and valid in the evaluation of the knowledge and skills for the clinical supervision of registered nurses. Further validation of the Chinese version of the mCSAT requires a more representative and larger sample. Also, the confirmatory factor analysis should be conducted in future study.