To Unifocalize or Not to Unifocalize?: A Comparison of Retroesophageal Versus Anterior Collaterals

Background: The anatomy of major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (MAPCAs) can be highly variable with regard to number, anatomic origin, course, and relationship to the native pulmonary arteries. Some MAPCAs travel behind the esophagus (retroesophageal) and bronchus before entering the lung parenchyma. This study compared the physiologic and surgical characteristics of retroesophageal vs anterior located MAPCAs.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of 42 patients who had 1 (n = 36) or 2 (n = 6) retroesophageal MAPCAs. These MAPCAs were then characterized as (1) single supply, meaning no connection to the pulmonary arteries; (2) dual supply, but inadequate connection to the distal pulmonary vascular bed; and (3) dual supply with adequate connection.

Results: The 42 patients presented with 187 MAPCAs, or 4.5 MAPCAs per patient. Of these, 48 MAPCAs were retroesophageal, including 40 that were single supply, 6 were dual supply with inadequate connection, and 2 had dual supply with adequate connection. On the basis of this anatomy and physiology, 96% of retroesophageal MAPCAs were unifocalized. For the 139 anterior MAPCAs, 89 were single supply, 15 were dual supply with inadequate connection, and 35 were dual supply with adequate connection; thus, 75% of anterior MAPCAs were unifocalized (P < .01 compared with retroesophageal MAPCAs).

Conclusions: The data demonstrate that retroesophageal MAPCAs had very different anatomy and physiology compared with anterior MAPCAs. These results suggest that nearly every retroesophageal MAPCA should be unifocalized to incorporate the lung segments supplied.