In these times of rapid advances in radiographic imaging, intravenous urography should be performed in an optimal way. The urographic examination should involve consultation between the referring physician and the radiologist. Necessary patient information should be accessible. McClennan said "patient selection for urographic studies should be efficacious with the radiologist exerting appropriate control so that the urogram is truly a consultative imaging service integrated into the total patient management." We share this view, and it is an extension of the philosophy of practice emphasized by other leaders in uroradiology. Cost containment, new imaging technologies, risk/benefit considerations, and evolving patterns of patient care have had a significant influence on genitourinary tract imaging. In addition, current debate about contrast media, digital radiography, efficacy, and utilization will undoubtedly have an influence on imaging during the next decade. Utilization of intravenous urography has decreased significantly in the past 15 years. Our volume of examinations has declined approximately 50% since 1970. This decline in our practice is attributed to several complex factors such as previous overutilization of screening urography for hypertension; the impact of US and CT for evaluation of obstruction, retroperitoneal disease (adenopathy and fibrosis), renal failure, and renal masses; concern about contrast medium-induced renal failure; and fewer repeat studies because of improved quality of intravenous urography in general radiology practice. In addition, overutilization of urography in patients with hematuria, prostatism, history of urinary tract infection, etc, continues to be debated in the medical community. In our integrated group practice, we have also observed overutilization of "high-tech" procedures in lieu of urography for evaluation of suspected urinary tract disease. Swings of the pendulum are inevitable in diagnostic imaging because of evolving technology and the art of medical practice. Although some differences of opinion about the details of urographic technique and indications for urography may exist, most would agree on the philosophy of producing a high-quality urographic examination. That philosophy focuses on producing the highest quality examination in each patient so that a diagnosis of normal or abnormal can be made accurately and confidently. Failure to demonstrate the entire urinary tract is a common cause of diagnostic error and one that can largely be eliminated by careful attention to the technical details of the examination.