Background: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile-duct (IPNB) has recently been further subclassified into "so-called IPNBs" (Type-1) and "narrow-sense papillary cholangiocarcinomas" (Type-2), but their differential diagnosis is challenging. This study aimed to reevaluate Type-1 and Type-2 IPNBs.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent papillary bile-duct tumor resection were included. Using six pathological features (location, mucin secretion, histological architecture, histological type, presence of a low/intermediate-dysplasia component, and proportion of the invasive component), all papillary tumors were scored. Tumors scoring 5-6 were classified as Type-1, 0-1 as Type-2, and 2-4 as Type-Unclassifiable.
Results: The 181 papillary bile-duct tumor patients were divided into three groups, consisting of 12 Type-1, 46 Type-2, and 123 Type-Unclassifiable-gray-zone lesions between Type-1 and Type-2 that constituted the largest proportion of papillary tumors. Type-1 tumors were pathologically the least advanced, while the other types showed gradual advancement. The 5-year survival rate was better for patients with Type-1 tumors than for those with Type-Unclassifiable or Type-2 tumors.
Conclusion: The scoring system worked well to delineate a continuous spectrum of pathologic features ranging from Type-1, through Type-Unclassifiable, to Type-2, the latter two being challenging to differentially diagnose. Type-1 is regarded as an early neoplasm of Type-Unclassifiable and Type-2.
Copyright © 2021 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.