Reply letter to "response to article by Johnna Perdrizet et al." by Gomez and colleagues

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1917237. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1917237. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

Abstract

This communication seeks to address the questions and criticisms issued by Gomez and colleagues in their letter on our original study "Cost-effectiveness analysis of replacing the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in Brazil infants." Gomez and colleagues are concerned that the assumptions used in our model may have unintended negative impacts for Brazil decision-making and we intend to clarify any potential misinterpretation of our assessment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Brazil
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Pneumococcal Infections* / prevention & control
  • Pneumococcal Vaccines
  • Vaccines, Conjugate

Substances

  • Pneumococcal Vaccines
  • Vaccines, Conjugate

Grants and funding

Pfizer Inc. funded this reply letter publication.