Near-Occlusion is a Common Variant of Carotid Stenosis: Study and Systematic Review

Can J Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;49(1):55-61. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2021.50. Epub 2021 May 14.

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion is often described as rare. Recent studies have shown that near-occlusions are overlooked, especially near-occlusion without full collapse (with a small but normal-appearing distal internal carotid artery).

Objective: To assess the prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion, and review the literature.

Methods: Prospective controlled single-center cross-sectional study. Consecutive cases with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were examined with computed tomography angiography (CTA). The CTAs were assessed for near-occlusion by two observers. A systematic literature review was performed with emphasis on how study design affects prevalence estimate.

Results: Totally, 186 patients with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis were included, 34% (n = 63, 95% CI 27, 41) had near-occlusion. The incidence of symptomatic near-occlusion was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5, 4.2) per 100,000 person-years. Inter-rater κ was 0.71. The average prevalence of near-occlusion among symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis was higher in studies with good design (30%, range 27%-34%) than studies without good design (9%, range 2%-10%).

Conclusions: Near-occlusion is common variant of symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis, both in the current study and in all previous studies of good design. Studies that suggest that near-occlusion is rare have had methodological issues.

Keywords: Carotid near-occlusion; Carotid stenosis; Incidence; Prevalence; Stroke.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Carotid Artery, Internal
  • Carotid Stenosis* / diagnostic imaging
  • Carotid Stenosis* / epidemiology
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies