Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency for solid tumor immunotherapy eligibility: immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite molecular testing

Hum Pathol. 2021 Sep:115:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 28.

Abstract

While many landmark solid tumor immunotherapy studies show clinical benefits for solid tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), the methodologies focus only on confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for MSI-H. Because some tumors are either dMMR or MSI-H but not the other, clinicians must choose between two testing methods for a broad patient population. We investigated the level of correlation between MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite PCR testing results in 62 cancer patients. Thirty-five of the 62 cases (56.5%) were MSI-H by PCR, whereas 35 (56.5%) were dMMR by IHC. MMR IHC results correlated well with MSI PCR in 32 co-positive cases (91.4%) and 24 co-negative cases (88.9%). Six discrepant cases (9.7%) were identified, among which three were MSI-H and MMR intact, and three were dMMR and microsatellite stable. The results of this study highlight the implications of dMMR/MSI testing strategies on precision oncology. Co-testing with both MMR IHC and MSI PCR may be an effective screening strategy for evaluating immunotherapy eligibility status for solid tumors.

Keywords: Checkpoint inhibition; Colorectal cancer; Microsatellite instability (MSI); Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR); Precision genomics; Precision immunotherapy; Solid tumors; Testing discrepancy.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / analysis*
  • DNA Mismatch Repair*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry / methods*
  • Immunotherapy / methods
  • Male
  • Microsatellite Instability
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Neoplasms / genetics
  • Patient Selection
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor