A cost-effectiveness analysis of iStent inject combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma in France

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252130. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of implementing iStent inject trabecular bypass stent (TBS) in conjunction with cataract surgery (Cat Sx) in patients with mild-to-moderate glaucoma from a societal perspective in France. The secondary objective was to explore the economic impact of iStent inject TBS in patients who comply to different degrees with their anti-glaucoma medications.

Methods: A previously published Markov model was adapted to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treatment with iStent inject TBS + Cat Sx versus Cat Sx alone over a lifetime time horizon in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma in France. Progression was modeled by health states reflecting increasing stages of vision loss. Disease progression was obtained from the two-year randomized clinical trial assessing safety and effectiveness of both interventions. French specific health-state utilities and costs were obtained through a targeted literature review. Model structure and inputs were validated by French ophthalmologists. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The robustness of results was tested through sensitivity analyses.

Results: iStent inject TBS + Cat Sx reduced the number of medications needed and risk of blindness. Incremental cost and QALYs were €75 and 0.065 leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €1,154/QALY gained. ICER ranged from dominating for non-persistent patients to €31,127 patients fully persistent with their medication regime. Results from one-way sensitivity analysis had a maximum ICER of €29,000 when varying input parameters. iStent inject TBS + Cat Sx had an 86% chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY gained.

Conclusion: Results demonstrate that iStent inject TBS + Cat Sx is a cost-effective intervention for intraocular pressure reduction when compared to Cat Sx alone in France.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cataract / complications
  • Cataract / economics
  • Cataract / therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Female
  • France
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle* / drug therapy
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle* / economics
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Markov Chains
  • Middle Aged
  • Phacoemulsification* / economics
  • Phacoemulsification* / methods
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*

Grants and funding

Funding for this study was provided to Pharmerit International by Glaukos Corporation. HF and GG are current employees of Glaukos Corporation and provided ideas and support for the study design, data collection, and manuscript development. KN, JK, AO, and MT are current or former employees of Pharmerit International, now called OPEN Health, an independent research organization, and maintained independent scientific control over the study, including final study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of results, and preparation of the manuscript. AL and CS received consultant fees for their role in study design, interpretation of results and review of the manuscript. All authors jointly decided to publish the manuscript.