Lumbar spondylolisthesis: STATE of the art on assessment and conservative treatment

Carla Vanti; Silvano Ferrari; Andrew A Guccione; Paolo Pillastrini

doi:10.1186/s40945-021-00113-2

Lumbar spondylolisthesis: STATE of the art on assessment and conservative treatment

Arch Physiother. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00113-2.

Authors

Carla Vanti¹, Silvano Ferrari², Andrew A Guccione³, Paolo Pillastrini²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy. [email protected].
² Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
³ Department of Rehabilitation Science, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.

Abstract

Introduction: There is weak relationship between the presence of lumbar spondylolisthesis [SPL] and low back pain that is not always associated with instability, either at the involved lumbar segment or at different spinal levels. Therefore patients with lumbar symptomatic SPL can be divided into stable and unstable, based on the level of mobility during flexion and extension movements as general classifications for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Different opinions persist about best treatment (conservative vs. surgical) and among conservative treatments, on the type, dosage, and progression of physical therapy procedures.

Purpose and importance to practice: The aim of this Masterclass is to provide clinicians evidence-based indications for assessment and conservative treatment of SPL, taking into consideration some subgroups related to specific clinical presentations.

Clinical implications: This Masterclass addresses the different phases of the assessment of a patient with SPL, including history, imaging, physical exam, and questionnaires on disability and cognitive-behavioral components. Regarding conservative treatment, self- management approaches and graded supervised training, including therapeutic relationships, information and education, are explained. Primary therapeutic procedures for pain control, recovery of the function and the mobility through therapeutic exercise, passive mobilization and antalgic techniques are suggested. Moreover, some guidance is provided on conservative treatment in specific clinical presentations (lumbar SPL with radiating pain and/or lumbar stenosis, SPL complicated by other factors, and SPL in adolescents) and the number/duration of sessions.

Future research priorities: Some steps to improve the diagnostic-therapeutic approach in SPL are to identify the best cluster of clinical tests, define different lumbar SPL subgroups, and investigate the effects of treatments based on that classification, similarly to the approach already proposed for non-specific LBP.