Inequalities in the distribution of National Institutes of Health research project grant funding

Elife. 2021 Sep 3:10:e71712. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71712.

Abstract

Previous reports have described worsening inequalities of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We analyzed Research Project Grant data through the end of Fiscal Year 2020, confirming worsening inequalities beginning at the time of the NIH budget doubling (1998-2003), while finding that trends in recent years have reversed for both investigators and institutions, but only to a modest degree. We also find that career-stage trends have stabilized, with equivalent proportions of early-, mid-, and late-career investigators funded from 2017 to 2020. The fraction of women among funded PIs continues to increase, but they are still not at parity. Analyses of funding inequalities show that inequalities for investigators, and to a lesser degree for institutions, have consistently been greater within groups (i.e. within groups by career stage, gender, race, and degree) than between groups.

Keywords: computational biology; government; inequality; none; policy; research funding; systems biology; workforce.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research* / economics
  • Biomedical Research* / organization & administration
  • Biomedical Research* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Financing, Government* / economics
  • Financing, Government* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)* / economics
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)* / organization & administration
  • National Institutes of Health (U.S.)* / statistics & numerical data
  • Racism
  • Sexism
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • United States

Grants and funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.