Impact of Circulatory Assistance in the Early Evolution After Heart Transplantation. Unicentric Experience

Transplant Proc. 2021 Nov;53(9):2731-2733. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.041. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Abstract

Background: Heart transplantation (HT) is the reference treatment for patients with terminal heart failure. In recent years there has been a progressive increase in HT procedures in patients who have a circulatory support (CS).

Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study of 293 consecutive patients who underwent HT from 2009 to 2018, analyzing the evolution of the 2 cohorts: patients with and without CS as a bridge to HT. Baseline and evolutionary clinical data collected following the usual follow-up protocol were recorded, including clinical events observed during the follow-up 1 year after the procedure.

Results: The subgroup of patients transplanted with CS showed a higher incidence of primary graft failure, frequent infection, and mortality. A tendency toward lower cardiac allograft vasculopathy was observed in this subgroup. Mechanical ventilation added to the CS resulted in a higher incidence of primary graft failure, infection, and renal dysfunction. The CS variable as a bridge to HT was shown to be predictive of 1-year mortality in both univariate (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.3; P = .038) and multivariate (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.3; P = .047) analyses.

Conclusions: In our experience, CS as a bridge to HT results in a higher incidence of primary graft failure, frequent infection, and mortality at 1-year follow-up. Mechanical ventilation added to CS has a clear unfavorable prognostic impact. CS as a bridge to HT was shown to be predictive of 1-year mortality in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

MeSH terms

  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Failure* / surgery
  • Heart Transplantation* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies