[Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposomes compared to paclitaxel combined with platinum in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cervical carcinoma: a Meta-analysis]

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 23;43(10):1132-1139. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210422-00337.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposomes compared to paclitaxel with platinum in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cervical carcinoma. Methods: SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang MED ONLINE, VIP, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to collect the papers or clinical studies of paclitaxel liposomes and paclitaxel combined with platinum in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cervical carcinoma from the inception to January 15th 2021 in Chinese and English. Two independent reviewers screened the literatures, extracted the data and assessed the bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and R software. Results: Totally 9 papers involving 666 patients with unresectable cervical carcinoma were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that compared to paclitaxel combined with platinum in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cervical carcinoma, paclitaxel liposomes combined with platinum exhibited superiority in near-term efficacy (complete response + partial response) [81.4%(272/334) vs 68.7%(228/332), RR=1.19; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.29, P=0.000 1]; substantially decreased the incidence rates of blood system disorders [myelosuppressio, 50.3%(168/334)vs 65.1%(216/332)], gastrointestinal disorders [34.4%(115/334) vs 55.1%(183/332)], alopecia [42.2%(94/223)vs 63.3%(140/221)], allergic reaction [11.6% (23/198)vs 27.6%(54/196), P≤0.000 1], peripheral neuritis [43.0%(52/121) vs 54.9%(67/122)], or joint and muscle pain [20.3%(16/79) vs 34.6%(28/81), P<0.050 0]. Conclusion: Compared to paclitaxel combined with platinum in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cervical carcinoma, paclitaxel liposomes is superior in near-term efficacy, and exhibits better safety.

目的: 评价紫杉醇脂质体注射剂和紫杉醇注射液联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗无法手术切除宫颈癌的临床疗效与安全。 方法: 检索中国生物医学文献服务系统、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普资讯中文期刊服务平台、PubMed、MEDLINE、The Cochrane Library、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,收集有关紫杉醇脂质体注射剂和紫杉醇注射液联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗无法手术切除宫颈癌的文献,检索时限均为从建库至2021年1月15日,检索语言为中文和英文。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.4和R软件进行Meta分析。 结果: 纳入9篇文献共666例无法手术切除的宫颈癌患者。紫杉醇脂质体注射剂联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗无法手术切除宫颈癌的近期疗效(完全缓解+部分缓解)优于紫杉醇注射液联合顺铂同步放化疗[分别为81.4%(272/334)和68.7%(228/332),RR为1.19,95% CI为1.09~1.29, P=0.000 1]。紫杉醇脂质体注射剂联合顺铂同步放化疗降低了血液系统不良反应[骨髓抑制分别为50.3%(168/334)和65.1%(216/332)]、胃肠道不良反应[分别为34.4%(115/334)和55.1%(183/332)]、脱发[分别为42.2%(94/223)和63.3%(140/221)]、过敏反应[分别为11.6%(23/198)和27.6%(54/196)]的发生率(均P≤0.000 1),降低了外周神经炎[分别为43.0%(52/121)和54.9%(67/122)]、肌肉关节酸痛[分别为20.3%(16/79)和34.6%(28/81)]的发生率(均P<0.050 0)。 结论: 联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗无法手术切除的宫颈癌,紫杉醇脂质体注射剂总体有效率优于紫杉醇注射液,且安全性更高。.

Keywords: Cervical neoplasms; Meta-analysis; Paclitaxel; Paclitaxel liposomes.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma*
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Humans
  • Liposomes
  • Paclitaxel*
  • Platinum

Substances

  • Liposomes
  • Platinum
  • Paclitaxel