[Comparison of two osteotomies in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis]

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 15;35(11):1440-1448. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107075.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of modified distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy (DTT-HTO) and open-wedge HTO (OWHTO) in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis.

Methods: A clinical data of 80 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with HTO between January 2016 and January 2019 was retrospectively analyzed, including 40 patients treated with DTT-HTO (DTT-HTO group) and 40 patients treated with OWHTO (OWHTO group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, affected side, disease duration, Kellgren-Lawrence grading of osteoarthritis, and preoperative knee society score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, knee joint visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), weight-bearing line ratio (WBL), Blackburne-Peel index (BPI), Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), and Insall-Salvati index (ISI) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, incision length, bleeding volume, hospital stay, and complications in both groups were recorded. The KSS, HSS, and VAS scores were used to evaluated the effectiveness. A self-made questionnaire was used to evaluate the recovery of low-impact sports ability of the knee. X-ray films were used to observe the osteotomy healing and measure the HKA, PTS, WBL, and the patellar height indexes (BPI, CDI, ISI).

Results: All operations successfully completed in both groups. The OWHTO group operated longer than the DTT-HTO group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incision length, bleeding volume, and hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention in both groups. There were 2 cases of lateral hinge fractures in the OWHTO group, and 1 case of lateral hinge fracture and 2 cases of tibial plateau fractures in the DTT-HTO group. No other complications occurred. The patients in both groups were followed up 2-4 years with an average of 2.8 years. The HSS, KSS, and VAS scores in both groups significantly improved after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05). All scores gradually improved with the time and there were significant differences between different time points ( P<0.05). The HSS, KSS, and VAS scores were significantly better in the DTT-HTO group than in the OWHTO group at 3 months after operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years ( P>0.05). At 1 year, the low-impact sports ability of the OWHTO group was rated as excellent in 8 cases, general in 25 cases, and poor in 7 cases, and as excellent in 7 cases, general in 26 cases, and poor in 7 cases of the DTT-HTO group. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( Z=-0.715, P=0.475). X-ray film reexamination showed that the osteotomies healed in both groups. The healing time was (4.52±1.23) months in the OWHTO group, and (4.23±1.56) months in the DTT-HTO group, showing no significant difference ( t=0.923, P=0.359). At immediate after operation, the HKA and WBL of the two groups significantly improved when compared with the preoperative values ( P<0.05). However, the pre- and post-operational difference was not significant between the two groups ( P>0.05). The PTS of the OWHTO group was significantly higher than preoperative value ( P<0.05), while the PTS of the DTT-HTO group was lower than preoperative value ( P>0.05). The pre- and post-operational difference between the two groups was significant ( P<0.05). BPI and CDI in the OWHTO group were significantly lower than preoperative values ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in ISI when compared with preoperative value ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the BPI, CDI, and ISI of the DTT-HTO group between pre- and post-operation ( P>0.05). The pre- and post-operational differences of BPI and CDI between the two groups were significant ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the pre- and post-operational difference of ISI ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: The two osteotomies in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis can significantly change the varus deformity and achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The early functional recovery of DTT-HTO is faster, which can avoid the increased PTS and patellar baja of traditional OWHTO. However, neither of the two surgical procedures can restore the patient's ideal low-impact sports ability of the knee.

目的: 比较改良胫骨结节下单平面胫骨高位截骨术(modified distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy,DTT-HTO)和内侧开放楔形 HTO(open-wedge HTO,OWHTO)治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效差异。.

方法: 回顾分析 2016 年 1 月—2019 年 1 月 采用 HTO 治疗的 80 例膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎患者临床资料,其中 40 例采用 DTT-HTO(DTT-HTO 组)、40 例采用 OWHTO(OWHTO 组)。两组患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数、侧别、病程、骨关节炎 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级,以及术前膝关节学会评分系统(KSS)评分、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、膝关节疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、髋-膝-踝角(hip-knee-ankle angle,HKA)、胫骨平台后倾角(posterior tibial slope,PTS)、下肢负重力线比率(weight-bearing line ratio,WBL)、Blackburne-Peel 指数(Blackburne-Peel index,BPI)、Caton-Deschamps 指数(Caton-Deschamps index,CDI)、Insall-Salvati 指数(Insall-Salvati index,ISI)比较,差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。记录两组手术时间、切口长度、出血量、住院时间以及并发症发生情况;采用 KSS 评分、HSS 评分、VAS 评分综合评价疗效;采用自制调查问卷评价患者膝关节低冲击运动能力恢复情况。X 线片复查截骨愈合情况,测量 HKA、PTS、WBL 以及髌骨高度相关指数(BPI、CDI、ISI)。.

结果: 两组手术均顺利完成,OWHTO 组手术时间长于 DTT-HTO 组( P<0.05),切口长度、出血量、住院时间组间差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术后两组切口均Ⅰ期愈合。OWHTO 组发生外侧合页骨折 2 例,DTT-HTO 组发生外侧合页骨折 1 例、平台骨折 2 例;无其他并发症发生。两组患者均获随访,随访时间 2~4 年,平均 2.8 年。两组术后 HSS 评分、KSS 评分、VAS 评分均较术前改善,术后随时间延长均进一步改善,组内各时间点间差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。DTT-HTO 组术后 3 个月 HSS 评分、KSS 评分、VAS 评分优于 OWHTO 组( P<0.05),术后 6 个月及 1、2 年时组间差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。术后 1 年,OWHTO 组膝关节低冲击运动能力恢复达优 8 例、一般 25 例、差 7 例,DTT-HTO 组达优 7 例、一般 26 例、差 7 例,组间比较差异无统计学意义( Z=−0.715, P=0.475)。X 线片复查示两组截骨均愈合,OWHTO 组愈合时间为(4.52±1.23)个月,DTT-HTO 组为(4.23±1.56)个月,差异无统计学意义( t=0.923, P=0.359)。术后即刻两组 HKA 和 WBL 均较术前改善( P<0.05),但两组间手术前后差值差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。OWHTO 组 PTS 较术前增加( P<0.05),而 DTT-HTO 组 PTS 较术前减小( P>0.05),两组间手术前后差值差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。OWHTO 组 BPI 和 CDI 较术前下降( P<0.05),而 ISI 与术前比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);DTT-HTO 组上述指数与术前比较,差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。组间 BPI 和 CDI 手术前后差值比较,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05),ISI 手术前后差值差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。.

结论: 两种 HTO 术式均能改变下肢力线并取得良好疗效,其中 DTT-HTO 术后早期功能恢复更快,能避免 OWHTO 存在的 PTS 增大和低位髌骨问题;但两种术式均不能使患者恢复理想的膝关节低冲击运动能力。.

Keywords: Knee; medial compartment; modified distal tibial tubercle-high tibial osteotomy; open-wedge high tibial osteotomy; osteoarthritis.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee* / surgery
  • Osteotomy
  • Patella
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tibia / surgery

Grants and funding

安徽医科大学校科研基金(2020xkj262);北京市朝阳区科技计划项目(CYSF1829)